Education is, if one is to believe the rhetoric, a very high priority for this nation. This message goes out from city, county, state, and national offices. Admirable. One must first define “education” though, as education occurs every second of every day. The education mentioned by the various governments is the institutional variety, that which occurs in public classrooms. It is said, quite often, that we need to place the highest priority on education. Not surprisingly, every priority has defenders. Health, education, welfare are all intertwined, and have all been national priorities at one time or another. The test of whether education, or anything else, is actually a real priority comes when there isn’t quite enough money or time, or both, to go around. Now is one of those times. Part of the federal stimulus package is for education ($100 billion +). Arne Duncan, President Obama’s Education Secretary, has a big job on his hands. He has to see that this money is well spent by the states. In California, as in other states, the budget is a bit difficult just now. School districts around the state are in the process of passing out pink slips by the hundreds, which equals thousands when all the districts are counted (according to the California Teachers Association, 25,000). The districts probably don’t have much choice, as March 15th is the date that they must notify credentialed staff that they may not have a job next for the next school year. School districts around the state are still in the process of allocating funds, figuring out what to cut. Mostly, the cuts will be painful. Some, in this state and in other states, probably should have been made long ago. What is important is that the cuts be made as far away from the classroom as possible. What is probably real is that a large number of good, young teachers will lose their jobs, class sizes will go up, and test scores will go down. A district in the Sacramento area has issued close to 400 pink slips. This is just one district in one small part of the state. They went all the way back to 2001 and have notified the teachers hired since then that they may be out of work in June. By May 15, some of these teachers will still have jobs, and, sadly, some will not, May 15 being the day that the pink slips become real. This is not putting education in a high priority status. It is giving lip service to the idea and failing to back it up with actions. The federal stimulus package has given California money for education. The state, in turn, is working out the details for how the money will trickle down to the districts. The districts have a rough idea about how much they are going to receive. Still, the pink slips go out, the morale tanks, and the newer teachers have now been put in a position of figuring out what they will do for work when June arrives. They are expected, however, to somehow stay focused on their classrooms. Quite hard to do I think. Mortgages, health insurance, car payments, food are now viewed in a different light. One of the big disconnects in this scenario, and it is a big one, is that the people who are in charge of issuing the pink slips are not in danger of losing anything. They also don’t teach anyone, and rarely visit a classroom. Their jobs, perks, and benefits are all secure. The entire layoff procedure is a piece of business for them. It’s not that they should be in the classrooms. Their jobs are, after all, different. They should, however, be far more connected to the damage done to education when they okay hundreds of pink slips. Some jobs will be saved by older teachers retiring, others by leaves of absences for various reasons. The disticts should focus on how they can keep as many teachers as possible, instead of figuring out how many pink slips to issue. Education needs these good, talented young teachers to lead us forward. Without them, we stagnate, and that is not a good thing to have happen, now or ever. Some of these good young teachers will abandon the field for good, feeling, rightfully I think, let down by the the very people who claim that education has just got to be a very high priority for this nation. It is an easy thing to say, especially by government and administrators who will continue to have jobs when June rolls around. Education as a priority? Prove it, Mr. President, Ms. Superintendent. Talk is, as always, very, very cheap.
Related Articles
No user responded in this post